The author in this editorial of the Austin-American Statesman makes a good case in regards to the controversial issue of immigration, in reference to the laws recently passed in Arizona. His argument really includes every American, whether you agree or disagree with how illegal immigration is being dealt with. Though he happens to be in support of President Obama’s lawsuit he argues that the issue regardless of where you stand should be resolved in a federal courthouse. His logic makes sense. Even though every state has its own problems regarding immigrants the standard should be set by the federal government to prevent profiling of American citizens. It’s obvious to everyone that America has numerous issues with illegal immigrants and the way they are handled. The author is by no means suggesting we turn a blind eye to aiding in breaking the law, but we should step back and reevaluate how we are handling the situation. The author suggests that federal interference is necessary to prevent confusion amongst the states. There needs to be a clearly stated law throughout the country, only allowing for flexibility in rare circumstances. No matter where you live illegal immigration affects every citizen and that is why a federal, not a state, decision should be made on the issue.
I personally agree with the points the author has made. I am in favor of immigration laws, but not in a way that subjects our citizens to profiling and discrimination simply because they may “look” suspicious to law enforcement. When one law enforcement official makes that choice you are acting based on opinion or feeling, not the law on which America is founded.
No comments:
Post a Comment